Universal Basic Income (UBI) in Society 2.0 is not conceived as a fragile single-source entitlement, but as a resilient and diversified framework. Each funding stream is both a revenue source and a signal: it directs economic power back into human dignity, planetary stewardship, and social cohesion. Together, these streams ensure that every person has guaranteed access to essentials while corporations and wealth-holders are tethered to fairness and contribution.
1. Data Pooling & Licensing (25%)
- Annual Yield (Est., U.S. 2025): $400–600B (≈10–20% of $3T ad/AI data market).
- Why It Fits: Captures AI/advertising windfalls and redistributes them equitably without surveillance of individuals. Everyone benefits from the collective digital commons.
- S2 Tie-In: Funds Civic App contributions (volunteering, cultural work, governance participation). Fork option: privacy-protecting individuals receive bonus Earth Credits (ECs) for opting into stronger consent regimes.
- Challenges & Mitigation: Regulatory complexity; mitigated through university-led consent DAOs (e.g., UC Davis, Stanford) that certify ethical data pooling.
2. Property & Land Value Tax (20%)
- Annual Yield (Est.): $300–500B.
- Why It Fits: Captures unearned land and property scarcity, discourages hoarding, and stabilizes housing markets.
- S2 Tie-In: Rebates directed into Micro-Villages, adaptive housing conversions, and community revitalization. Fork option: tiered exemptions for agricultural land to protect Valley farmers.
- Challenges & Mitigation: Political pushback in rural areas; mitigated with tiered rates (e.g., farms taxed at 50%).
3. Market Capitalization Tax (15%)
- Annual Yield (Est.): $200–400B (0.2–0.5% levy on public company market caps).
- Why It Fits: Taps corporate giants (especially AI leaders) at scale while curbing speculative bubbles.
- S2 Tie-In: Scales alongside Earth Credit profit-gating: no distributable profit without earned ECs. Fork option: rebates for startups reinvesting in R&D and community benefit.
- Challenges & Mitigation: Risk of volatility/offshoring; mitigated through alignment with global tax efforts (e.g., G20 digital tax frameworks).
4. Carbon & Resource Rents (15%)
- Annual Yield (Est.): $150–300B.
- Why It Fits: Redirects ecological externalities into social dividends, flipping fossil fuel subsidies into resilience funding.
- S2 Tie-In: Funds environmental initiatives tied to the Solar Aqueduct, desal brine-to-battery programs, and carbon-negative restoration. Fork option: extra EC multipliers for regional pilots in energy and water security.
- Challenges & Mitigation: Strong industry resistance; mitigated with phased transition rebates and revenue recycling to affected workers.
5. Wealth & Progressive Surtax (10%)
- Annual Yield (Est.): $100–200B (e.g., 2% levy on net worth over $50M).
- Why It Fits: Directly addresses extreme concentration of wealth (top 1% hold ~32% of U.S. wealth). A visible and equitable contribution from those who benefited most from Society 1.0.
- S2 Tie-In: Funds Justice initiatives — especially Rehabilitation Villages that replace prisons with pathways of dignity and contribution. Fork option: convert a portion into “Impact Wealth Credits” allowing billionaires to offset liability through verified philanthropy.
- Challenges & Mitigation: Risk of evasion via trusts and offshore vehicles; mitigated by AI-driven audits and transparency requirements.
6. AI Disruption Tax (15%)
- Annual Yield (Est.): $35–70B initially; plausibly $100B+ by 2030 as automation scales.
- Why It Fits: AI is a commercial product that displaces jobs while concentrating wealth. An AI tax captures part of these gains to fund social stability and transition.
- S2 Tie-In: Serves as a transitional bridge. In S1, it operates like a targeted levy (on AI revenues, savings, or market cap). In S2, it evolves into Earth Credit issuance linked to verified AI benefits.
- Challenges & Mitigation: Measurement of AI-driven profits can be fuzzy; mitigated by starting with modest rates (3–5% of direct AI revenues, 5% of reported AI savings) and scaling with better data.
Why Diversification Matters
- Stability Across Cycles: Property taxes stay steady in recessions; data pools grow as AI expands; carbon rents escalate with climate urgency. No single downturn can collapse the system.
- Coalition-Building: Different streams appeal to different political blocs — technologists back data dividends, environmentalists back carbon rents, populists back wealth taxes, centrists back property taxes.
- Alignment With S2 Rungs: Each revenue stream maps to a pillar of Society 2.0: survival, environment, justice, economy, and transition. UBI becomes not just a payout but a reflection of shared priorities.
- Global Scalability: Modular adoption: Africa might lean on resource rents, the EU on data dividends, Asia on property taxation. The diversified model allows localization while preserving global coherence.
UBI in Society 2.0 is not a safety net, but a dignity floor. By tying its funding to data, land, corporate scale, ecological stewardship, wealth fairness, and AI responsibility, the system ensures that every dollar and every Earth Credit flows back into the survival, growth, and flourishing of people and planet alike.
Why an AI Tax?
- Massive Productivity Gains: AI displaces workers, but the productivity/efficiency gains flow primarily to shareholders.
- Revenue Gap: Without intervention, tax bases (income/payroll) shrink while corporate concentration grows.
- Fairness Principle: Just as carbon emitters pay for ecological costs, AI deployers should pay for social disruption.
Possible AI Tax Designs (S1 Context)
- AI Output/Value-Add Tax
- Levy a small percentage on profits directly attributable to AI-driven automation.
- Example: A bank saves $10B in operating costs by replacing call centers with AI → pays 5–10% of that into the public fund.
- AI Licensing Fees
- Models above a certain compute threshold (e.g., frontier-scale LLMs) require annual licensing tied to revenue.
- Fees scale with market cap or profit margin of deploying firm.
- AI Transaction/Usage Tax
- Micro-levies on high-volume API calls or AI-as-a-service usage, similar to VAT.
- Example: 0.1¢ per AI API request, aggregated at scale, yields billions annually.
- Market Cap Surcharge (AI Sector Focus)
- Targeted surtax on companies deriving >50% of revenue from AI.
- Simple to administer via SEC reporting.
Where Funds Go
- Immediate Cushion: Supplements payroll taxes for displaced workers.
- Transitional UBI: Distributed as a “universal refund” to all citizens (monthly stipend, no stigma).
- Retraining & Civic Work: Funds reskilling, ShiftLogic-style civic contribution platforms, and mental health services.
Mitigation: Start with modest rates + clear sunset clauses, reviewed every 5 years. If S2 transitions take root, AI tax revenue becomes one of several streams feeding the UBI/Earth Credit pool.
Step 1. Scope the AI-driven economy (U.S., 2025)
- AI sector revenue (core providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Microsoft Azure AI, etc.): ~$100–150B.
- AI-enabled productivity savings (enterprise cost reductions via automation, copilots, call center replacement, logistics, etc.): estimates range $500B–$1T annually by 2030.
- Broader AI-driven market capitalization uplift (equity gains from AI hype/real productivity): $3–5T added to U.S. market cap in 2023–25 alone.
Step 2. Reasonable Rates
- Direct AI Revenue Levy: 3–5% (like a digital services tax).
- AI Productivity “Savings Tax”: 5–10% on cost reductions reported in annual statements.
- Market Cap Surtax (AI-heavy firms): 0.1–0.25% annually.
Step 3. Yield Estimates (U.S.)
- Direct Revenue Levy (3–5% of $150B): $4.5–7.5B annually (small but clean).
- Productivity Savings Tax (5–10% of $500B): $25–50B annually.
- Market Cap Surtax (0.1–0.25% of $5T): $5–12.5B annually.
👉 Combined, an AI Tax Package could conservatively generate $35–70B annually in the U.S. by 2030, and plausibly cross $100B+ as automation scales.
How UBI Functions in Full S2
- Essentials as Non-Market Goods
- Food, housing, healthcare (including mental health), education, and energy are guaranteed as baseline rights.
- These are no longer commodities subject to speculation or scarcity pricing — they’re delivered through public–private partnerships (URMAP for meals, micro-villages for housing, AI-first healthcare).
- Earth Credit Allocations
- Every citizen receives a monthly EC distribution.
- ECs are required to access essentials — food programs, housing allocations, healthcare visits, education enrollment, energy credits.
- Because allocation is universal, there’s no stigma, no means test, no cliff effects.
- Corporate Profit Gating
- Companies must hold and spend ECs to extract profit (dividends, buybacks, executive bonuses).
- They can only earn ECs back through verified contributions: emissions reductions, equitable labor practices, ecological restoration, public benefit.
- Profit is licensed, not a natural right.
- World Dollars for Desires
- Wages, investments, discretionary goods/services are denominated in World Dollars.
- People can earn and spend WD freely — but essentials remain tied to EC allocations, ensuring no one falls below the dignity floor.
- Systemic Effect
- The floor of survival (ECs) is universal, unconditional, and non-speculative.
- The ceiling of desire (WDs) remains open and competitive.
- Together, this dual-currency system secures dignity while preserving innovation and personal ambition.
⚖️ The Philosophy Shift
- S1 UBI: Seen as income support, often conditional or tax-refund–like.
- S2 UBI: Seen as the issuance of Earth Credits — humanity’s collective share of the essential commons.
Previous: ShiftLogic Scheduling App – Overview; ShiftLogic – Deep Dive
Next: Police & Justice Reforms
Leave a Reply